Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: next steps?
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:58:45 +0300
On 26/01/13 12:39 PM, Ian G wrote:
In the alternate, what else is more pressing? CCA needs a big cleanup, and it has a lot of messy bits in the WIP on svn.
Also, Organisation Assurance Policy is suffering from not having been reviewed in a long time. It was our "earliest" policy from the 2007 era, and its age shows.
Any other suggestions?
To pick up on this, some other suggestions have circulated:
* move PoJAM to POLICY
* move Security Policy to POLICY
iang
(ps, There are also some background tasks such as putting these dox on the main site.)
- Re: next steps?, Ian G, 02/15/2013
- RE: next steps?, ulrich, 02/16/2013
- Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, ulrich, 02/22/2013
- RE: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, ulrich, 02/22/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Ian G, 02/22/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, hlehmbruch, 02/23/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Martin Gummi (CAcert.org), 02/23/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Martin Gummi (CAcert.org), 02/23/2013
- RE: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Alex Robertson, 02/22/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Brian McCullough, 02/22/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Guillaume ROMAGNY, 02/23/2013
- RE: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, ulrich, 02/22/2013
- Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, ulrich, 02/22/2013
- RE: next steps?, ulrich, 02/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.