Policy-Discussion

["Megan C. Robertson" <megan AT medals.org.uk>]

Greetings dear hearts,

As I recall, at a meeting last year the outgoing Board declined to appoint a
Policy Officer. Perhaps the Policy Group should either ask the new Board to
reconsider this, or decide to appoint one of our number to take on that
role.

It does seem to me that having an individual tasked with the role of keeping
track of policy decisions, promulgating them effectively via the CACert
website/wiki and ensuring that matters which arise are discussed and decided
upon by the Policy Group is a Good Idea.

'God so loved the world that He did not send a committee' :)

Hugs from Megan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Robertson 
> [mailto:alex-uk AT cacert.org]
> Sent: 20 February 2013 10:58
> To: 
> cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
> Subject: RE: improving p20100306 - minor changes
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian G 
> > [mailto:iang AT cacert.org]
> > Sent: 20 February 2013 03:30
> >
> >     1. vote on a policy officer.
> >
> >     2. adjust the above words so they say Policy Team instead
> >        of Officer, and add a caveat that the changes are
> >        notified to policy group (our general practice anyway).
> >
> >     3. incorporate words into PoP to that effect.
> >
> > What do people think?  Prefer 1,2,3 or something else?
> >
> > I apologise in advance, but it looks like we're in for another vote on
> stuff we
> > already have strong consensus on, and strong practice.
> >
> 
> Appoint a policy officer!!! In theory, the board should take on that role
> in
> the absence thereof....
> 
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6112 - Release Date: 02/17/13