Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Guillaume ROMAGNY <guillaume AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: next steps?
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:13:20 +0100
- Openpgp: id=EB42B796
Hello Werner,
Le 25/02/2013 16:41, Werner Dworak a écrit :
>> Btw. the Code Singing Policy should be buried in the current state. This
>> > will do only harm, alone the purpose (pass the audit) makes the policy
>> > senseless in my mind.
> We do have code signing and I regard it as an important asset of CAcert.
> On good reasons we require the holder of a code signing certificate to
> be an assurer. So he is well known and can be prosecuted if he does
> malicious things. So he will think twice and usually does not misbehave.
>
> Regards, Werner
>
>
Perfectly agreed. This is key feature in the IT world.
So the obvious question how to maintain the CS Policy ?
--
Cordialement, Best regards,
Guillaume
Vision without action is a daydream.
Action without vision is a nightmare. -- Japanese Proverb
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, (continued)
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Jan Dittberner, 02/23/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Philipp Dunkel, 02/23/2013
- RE: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Megan C. Robertson, 02/23/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Bernd Jantzen, 02/23/2013
- Re: next steps?, Benedikt Heintel, 02/16/2013
- RE: next steps?, ulrich, 02/17/2013
- Re: next steps?, Ian G, 02/17/2013
- Re: next steps?, Ian G, 02/17/2013
- Re: next steps?, Benedikt Heintel, 02/23/2013
- Re: next steps?, Werner Dworak, 02/25/2013
- Re: next steps?, Guillaume ROMAGNY, 02/25/2013
- Re: next steps?, Werner Dworak, 02/25/2013
- Re: next steps?, Benedikt Heintel, 02/23/2013
- Re: Vote on p20130222 PoJAM to POLICY, Jan Dittberner, 02/23/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.