Policy-Discussion

[Benedikt Heintel <benedikt AT cacert.org>]

> - 2.5 (private key disclosure),
I would let it as it is:
        2.5.3 does not make sense here, since it is about security and not
sharing. Sharing is denied in 2.3.5. which no-one opposed.
        2.5.4 is tricky, I would let it with arbitration to decide when 
necessary.

> - 3.3 (termination of CCA),
As proposed: put it in a separate / underlying policy. This policy needs
to be created asap until then, Arb is responsible for Termination

> - 4.1 (CAcert Inc. contracts with other parties)
As proposed: Drop it (and renumber the following ;) )

-- 
Benedikt Heintel - 
benedikt AT cacert.org
CAcert Assurer for People & Organizations
CAcert internal Auditor

CAcert.org - Secure Together
http://www.cacert.org

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature