Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Benedikt Heintel <benedikt AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: CCA: open points
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 21:29:50 +0200
>>> - 2.5 (private key disclosure),
>> 2.5.4 is tricky, I would let it with arbitration to decide when
>> necessary.
> What about giving a general hint in the CCA by including 2.5.4 and
> having arbitration decide on the specifica if conflicts arise?
That would be agreeable, if - and only if - the addition would be more
specific.
--
Benedikt Heintel -
benedikt AT cacert.org
CAcert Assurer for People & Organizations
CAcert internal Auditor
CAcert.org - Secure Together
http://www.cacert.org
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, (continued)
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, Alex Robertson, 05/27/2014
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, Eva Stöwe, 05/28/2014
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, Benny Baumann, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points / comments, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Benny Baumann, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Benedikt Heintel, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Benny Baumann, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Eva Stöwe, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Eva Stöwe, 05/29/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Ian G, 05/30/2014
- Re: CCA: open points, Alex Robertson, 05/29/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.