Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Yuri Nazarov <yuri AT nazarov.org>
- To: reinhard AT cacert.org, cacert AT lists.cacert.org, cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Cc: Board Public <cacert-board AT lists.cacert.org>, Board Private <cacert-board-private AT lists.cacert.org>
- Subject: Re: Answers
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:40:07 -0500
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM, reinhard
<reinhard AT cacert.org>
wrote:
> Dear Reader of these mailinglists,
>
>
> we received a lot of questions and said to answer them all.
> Many questions are of same or similar content and we decided to give the
> answers in the wiki.
>
> One of the most important things is the judicial framework on which
> CAcert Inc.
> is based on.
>
> Please take your time and check the given links in
>
> https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/proposal/answers01
>
There is strong correlation between the answers01 page, and a recent
submission to Policy Group made by CAcert Inc. secretary on behalf of
the board:
<https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2016-03/msg00006.html>
<https://wiki.cacert.org/Brain/CAcertInc/Committee/proposal/DRP_Request_For_Change>
Looking at the answers01 page in the light of this submission to
Policy Group, one can note that the answers01 page contains both the
actual current state as well as the proposed changes, mixed both
together.
I thing it is very important to clearly separate and clearly identify
proposed changes as such, and especially so in a page intended to
provide "one of the most important things is the judicial framework on
which CAcert Inc. is based on."
Thanks,
Yuri
- Re: Answers, Yuri Nazarov, 03/29/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.