Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: "Etienne Ruedin" <eruedin AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: idea about rules for cabinet
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:44:54 +0000 (UTC)
Dear policy group
3. Transparency
3.1. Public performance and documentation
Cabinet has to perform its business in public. There should not be a private
mailing list or the like.
I know why this point is here. I also appreciate Eve's commitment to
transparency. Nevertheless, I dare to put a question mark here.
The following e-mails I sent in the last days and weeks on board-private (the
closed list of CAcert Inc.'s committee): Please complete the agenda. X, did
you write that e-mail? Y, do you prefer Wednesday or Thursday? Who wrote the
second half of the minutes - please put into the wiki.
This leads, in my opinion, to two possibilities: either cabinet 'spam' a
public list full of irrelevant trivialities for the readers - or the cabinet
members write to their private e-mail addresses, which can not even be traced
by a later Cabinet (as it can be done by board-private actually).
And what about topics that are at a moment "secret" but can become public some
days or weeks later? (reasons: security, personnal matters (HR), preparations
of negotiations)?
A solution could be restrictions instead prohibition?
Best regards
Etienne
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Eva Stöwe, 03/05/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Alan Shea, 03/14/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Eva Stöwe, 03/15/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Etienne Ruedin, 03/15/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Eva Stöwe, 03/16/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Etienne Ruedin, 03/15/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Eva Stöwe, 03/15/2017
- Re: idea about rules for cabinet, Alan Shea, 03/14/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.