Policy-Discussion

[Michael Richardson <mcr AT sandelman.ca>]

<ctjacobs AT drschrisjacobs.nl>
 wrote:
    > If you find an assurer and then that assurer does not answer because
    > the email is not longer valid what happens to the bounce? I feel it
    > just disappears in a black hole. Instead the assurer should be
    > unlisted.

We should probably think about having an automated system that confirms their
email once or twice a year.

An announce-only mailman list with all assurers on it, and the "monthly"
message set to be every 4 or 6 months would probably work, as mailman knows
how to deal with bounces already. (no new software or systems).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature