Subject: Policy-Discussion
List archive
- From: Kim Nilsson <kim.nilsson AT no-substitute.com>
- To: cacert-policy AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: unhandled bounces
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 19:45:14 +0200
I agree.
This has been discussed among board members too.
There should be a "dead man's switch", where if you don't regularly tick a box, or something, when logged in to your CAcert profile, you should be unlisted as an assurer.
People should be able to expect a response from any listed assurer.
/Kim
Den fre 15 apr. 2022 18:46 <ctjacobs AT drschrisjacobs.nl> skrev:
If you find an assurer and then that assurer does not answer because the email
is not longer valid what happens to the bounce? I feel it just disappears in a
black hole. Instead the assurer should be unlisted.
- unhandled bounces, ctjacobs, 04/15/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Michael Richardson, 04/15/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Kim Nilsson, 04/15/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Kim Nilsson, 04/15/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Martin Lesser, 04/15/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Etienne Ruedin (CAcert Inc.), 04/16/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Kim Nilsson, 04/16/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, dirk astrath, 04/16/2022
- Re: unhandled bounces, Kim Nilsson, 04/16/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.