cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list
List archive
- From: Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:24:31 +1000
- List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/pipermail/cacert-sysadm>
- List-id: CAcert System Admins discussion list <cacert-sysadm.lists.cacert.org>
- Organization: CACert
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:52:37 pm IanG wrote:
> IanG wrote:
> > *to move our email over to CAcert email addresses.*
>
> I left some tracks to this issue in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/Threats/LegalDiscovery
>
> (I had thought that there was a wiki file with Threats in it
> but couldn't see it? Daniel?)
https://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/RiskAssessment
> (bottom of:)
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/CommunityEmail
> http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/PolicyDrafts/EmailHandling
> The priority for doing the final component -- an escrowed
> store of email -- is not high ... but should be an important
> thing that the email people are working on and thinking
> about.
I'm listening.
Outbound email needs to be sent though a the provided gateway too
http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/CommunityEmail (Yes I'm looking at you IanG)
> Obviously, there are a lot of unstated issues here
> that need to be thought out.
like:
1. need for policy procedures.
2. need to account for law i.e. TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION AND ACCESS)
ACT 1979 http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/taaa1979410/
cannot intercept email inbound until it has completed
http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Privacy/tia.html
could be out of scope as not in Australia. Need to check the binding of
Australian entities. Yay - handn't seen this before.
--
Daniel Black
(daniel AT cacert.org)
Email Administrator
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, IanG, 09/02/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, IanG, 09/03/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Daniel Black, 09/03/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Sam Johnston, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Teus Hagen, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Sam Johnston, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, IanG, 09/05/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Daniel Black, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Kim Holburn, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Sam Johnston, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Daniel Black, 09/05/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, IanG, 09/05/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Daniel Black, 09/05/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Kim Holburn, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Teus Hagen, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Sam Johnston, 09/04/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, Daniel Black, 09/03/2008
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Discovery, the bright new sword of the digital judiciary!, IanG, 09/03/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.