cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list
List archive
- From: "Ian G (Audit)" <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:21:09 +0100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=neutral header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
On 26/3/09 22:55, Mendel Mobach wrote:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Ian G (Audit) wrote:
Last question: is this machine to be designated a *critical machine*
and therefore slap-bang inside the Security Policy domain?
This one is designated critical. (But if the setup proves to be relative
trivial we could use it for some parts of the infrastructure too.)
OK, so does that mean it should get added to SP 1.1?
Or, is this machine to be designated an infrastructure machine and
therefore is run by our friendly but slightly more relaxed
infrastructure team?
No. This one not.
PS: I'm not promising it's the last question ...
The above is a question for Wytze, not for me ;-)
Don't worry. TV sucks tonight around here and I'm done with playing with
wireless from the village neighbors.
http://xkcd.com/341/
:)
iang
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, (continued)
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/25/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Sam Johnston, 03/25/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/25/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] no Objections to a possible setup, Daniel Black, 03/25/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/27/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Wytze van der Raay, 03/27/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Philipp Gühring, 03/27/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Ian G (Audit), 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/26/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Mendel Mobach, 03/27/2009
- Re: [Cacert-sysadm] Objections to a possible setup, Philipp Guehring, 03/27/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.