cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list
List archive
- From: "Christopher Hoth [CAcert.org]" <christopher AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: Requirments - monitoring
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:26:18 +0200
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
- Openpgp: id=8409F01F
- Organization: CAcert.org
Bases in c, php, perl, sh? ;)
Regards,
Christopher
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Requirments - monitoring
From: Bas van den Dikkenberg
<bas AT dikkenberg.net>
To:
cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
<cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org>
Date: Mon Aug 17 2009 12:21:48 GMT+0200 (CEST)
> I was thinking about an nrpe solution
>
>
> Bas
>
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Markus Warg
> [mailto:markus AT quarkus.de]
>
> Verzonden: maandag 17 augustus 2009 12:12
> Aan:
> cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
> Onderwerp: Re: Requirments - monitoring
>
> for DB monitoring, you could simply set up shell or perl or php cli
> scripts that perform the checks you want and put them into inetd/xinetd
> config (with IP access list). You don't neet to open up mysql to the net.
> Other solution would be nagios nrpe with local check scripts.
>
> regards,
>
> Markus
>
>
> Daniel Black schrieb:
>> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:45:11 Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am going to setup the new monitoring system but have acoppel of
> question.
>>> 1. What system and services do want to monitor?
>> email / lists/ blog / wiki - the port connectivity and functionality like
>> seeing if port 143 is really IMAP
>>
>> as some of these are database backend access could be opened up to verify
> the
>> structure and maybe stats based on queries - how many email aliases are
> there,
>> how many users, how many list subscribers.
>>
>>> 2. Who needs to be notifed when there is problem? A mailing list?
>> there was a plan to do a DR list of non-cacert emails. Perhaps sending it
> to
>> there. For the more critical service breakdowns an irc notification -
> freenode
>> and cacert?
>>> 3. Access to the webinterface is this public or sysadmin only ?
>> If its status information only I'm pretty happy for this to be public. RSS
> as
>> a minor thought of distributing notification.
>>
- Requirments, Bas van den Dikkenberg, 08/04/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Daniel Black, 08/05/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Markus Warg, 08/17/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Christopher Hoth [CAcert.org], 08/17/2009
- RE: Requirments - monitoring, Bas van den Dikkenberg, 08/17/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Christopher Hoth [CAcert.org], 08/17/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Daniel Black, 08/21/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Markus Warg, 08/17/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Daniel Black, 08/06/2009
- Re: Requirments - monitoring, Daniel Black, 08/05/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.