CAcert System Admins discussion list

[Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>]

On 22/09/2009 02:52, Peter Williams wrote:
> One may wish to ensure that the CPs meets criteria beyond the original
> scope: Mozilla root registry.
>
> It seems to be only 1% more effort to meet current programs for
> ssl-based sso systems.


If it is members running the servers, I don't think a change is 
necessary as yet.  See other mail to policy+board, and+but ... i could 
be wrong both ways.


> All that is missing policywise is ca/ttp policy
> assertions and testing that certain statistical metrics about compromise
> are true.

I miss those missing assertions :)

I also wonder about the "certain statistical metrics about compromise." 
We have a fairly broad assertion which covers exactly that:  file a dispute.

Just IMHO!



iang

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature