cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list
List archive
- From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
- Subject: Re: blog / comments
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:20:56 +0200
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
On 04/10/2009 17:06, Daniel Black wrote:
On Monday 05 October 2009 01:18:08 Andreas Bürki wrote:
Does the crowd have to do to do login, if comments are moderated /controlled? I'm not really sure
about this.
logins, i.e. certificates are required to post or comment.
If that is so, and they are CAcert certs, then do we really need to have any spam control on there?
theoretically we would need them only for other certs. But even client certs from well known & governed CAs should probably be acceptable as a barrier without subjecting them to spam control.
What would be the workload to moderate / control and whoA setting can enable comments without registration/login.
does it?
don't know how much workload that would be. I'm imaging at least 5 spams a
day. This is what we were gettting when registration was still required to
comment. Now that I've got this to 0 handling this many is more than I want to
deal with. Volunteers welcome.
I just looked at 290 in the queue, all spam, all from the same IP#. I deleted them...
Now that a cert is required, my guess is we won't see any more.
iang
- blog / comments, Ian G, 10/04/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Daniel Black, 10/04/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Andreas Bürki, 10/04/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Daniel Black, 10/04/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Ian G, 10/04/2009
- blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Daniel Black, 10/05/2009
- Re: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Andreas Bürki, 10/05/2009
- Re: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Ian G, 10/25/2009
- Re: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Andreas Bürki, 10/25/2009
- Re: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Mario Lipinski, 10/29/2009
- RE: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, ulrich, 10/29/2009
- Re: blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Andreas Bürki, 10/25/2009
- blog curent status + possible wider range of accepted CAs. was: Re: blog / comments, Daniel Black, 10/05/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Ian G, 10/04/2009
- Re: blog / comments, Daniel Black, 10/04/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.