Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cacert-sysadm - Re: Fwd: [website form email]: No reverse DNS for IPv6

cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org

Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list

List archive

Re: Fwd: [website form email]: No reverse DNS for IPv6


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ian G <iang AT cacert.org>
  • To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
  • Subject: Re: Fwd: [website form email]: No reverse DNS for IPv6
  • Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:22:48 +0100
  • Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none

On 25/10/2009 22:14, Wytze van der Raay wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Moritz Augsburger
Subject: No reverse DNS for IPv6

I highly appreciate that you use IPv6, but perhaps you could also set a
PTR RR for your IP?

For anti spam reasons I block Mails from IPs without Reverse DNS:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[2001:7b8:3:9c::245]: 450 4.7.1 Client
host rejected: cannot find your reverse hostname, [2001:7b8:3:9c::245];
from=<returns AT cacert.org<mailto:returns AT cacert.org>>

The CAcert webserver has been running for a short period with the IPv6
address mentioned above, basically to perform some testing. The address
was inadvertently left enabled after completion of the test, it has now
been disabled again.
In the near future we will support IPv6 access, and of course setting up
appropriate AAAA and PTR RR records will be part of that.


IPv6 sounds good.  Wytze, are there any security ramifications in this move?

I would have not thought so ... it's just another IP, v += 2, right? But I'm not familiar enought with IPv6 to know. So I thought I'd ask.



iang


PS: comma is probably salivating over a possible blog post on this :)



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page