cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
Subject: CAcert System Admins discussion list
List archive
- From: Guillaume ROMAGNY - CAcert support <guillaume AT cacert.org>
- To: cacert-sysadm AT lists.cacert.org
- Cc: Ian G <iang AT iang.org>, Daniel Black <daniel AT cacert.org>, dieter.hennig AT id.ethz.ch
- Subject: Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:03:27 +0100
- Authentication-results: lists.cacert.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i= AT cacert.org; dkim-asp=none
- Openpgp: id=EB42B796
- Organization: CAcert Inc. support
Hello Ian,
Le 12.01.2010 21:46, Ian G a écrit :
> Alternatively, if you are suggesting that we start putting names into
> the Class 1 cert, this is a "change of claim" and this could cause
> problems. Sticking to the contract is generally a good idea, and if
> there has to be a change, it should be considered carefully.
We have the names in the Class1 certificates for so long !
There is practically no difference excepted the burden of the
intermediate Class3 cert chaining !
You can have a look at the cert signing this email ! (I hope it is
working) You have Organisation info + Name, same applies to non
organisational certs.
--
with best regards,
Guillaume Romagny (fr_FR)
CAcert.org - Free Certificates
E-mail:
guillaume AT cacert.org
- www.CAcert.org
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Daniel Black, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Guillaume ROMAGNY, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Philipp Gühring, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Andreas Bürki, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Andreas Bürki, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Philipp Gühring, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Guillaume ROMAGNY - CAcert support, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Daniel Black, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Mario Lipinski, 01/12/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain - dropping future class3 certificates (until NewRoots), Daniel Black, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain - dropping future class3 certificates (until NewRoots), Mario Lipinski, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Philipp Guehring, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/13/2010
- Antwort: Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, roberto . mazzoni, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Dieter Hennig, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain, Ian G, 01/13/2010
- Re: two possible MD5 hashed certificates in a chain - dropping future class3 certificates (until NewRoots), Daniel Black, 01/13/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.