Assumpte: A better approach to security
Arxiu de la llista
- From: Bob Ippolito <bob AT redivi.com>
- To: A better approach to security <cacert AT lists.cacert.org>, Duane <duane AT cacert.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet)
- Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 15:50:43 -0400
- List-archive: <http://lists.cacert.org/mailman/private/cacert>
- List-id: A better approach to security <cacert.lists.cacert.org>
On Aug 8, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Duane wrote:
David Kaufman wrote:
perhaps you didn't support your developer community, give them cvs
access, or start a dedicated mailing list for them to use to discuss
Couple things, pserver (CVS) has been the source of a lot of hacks on source forge etc, CAcert lacks any decent funding to have multiple servers and/or rack space for those servers, and I'm sure you aren't recommending that the developer community be given direct access to live code/databases...
Ok, that is bullshit. There are PLENTY of community sites such as sourceforge, savannah, etc. that give open source projects a free place to host a source code repository. The service costs exactly nothing, what's this about servers? Security isn't really an issue because the servers aren't yours, and if someone does manage to change your repository (which has almost zero chance of happening) then you'll see it next time you update. Also, if you REALLY don't like pserver, then don't use it. CVS isn't the only game in town, there's arch and subversion too.
-bob
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, (continuat)
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Greg Black, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- [CA cert] Re: Bet, John A. Martin, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Re: Bet, Duane, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Duane, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Greg Black, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] Bet, Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Matt Hilmers, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Duane, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Bob Ippolito, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Ryan Verner, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Bob Ippolito, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Nathan Reilly, 08/08/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), David Kaufman, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Duane, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Bob Ippolito, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Duane, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Greg Black, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Duane, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Greg Black, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Duane, 08/09/2004
- Re: [CA cert] The case for open source (was Re: Bet), Bob Ippolito, 08/08/2004
Arxiu generat per MHonArc 2.6.16.