A better approach to security

[Nathan Reilly <nathan AT bbuzzed.cx>]

On 22/08/2004, at 12:48 AM, LarryD wrote:
> I may be nitpicking here but seems to me there's a pretty good reason 
> for
> having the rules. And I guess I would have hoped any one requesting to
> become an assurer would be required to hit the mark completely.

Larry,

I completely agree with you. Once I finish the document I am currently 
working on, I'll be going over the assurance rules/policy and make some 
recommendations. If you have anything you'd like to add/make note of 
for this document, either mail me, or post it to the list. The same 
goes for anyone else wanting to have any input.

Regards,

Nathan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature